Wednesday, March 28, 2012
SEEING FREEDOM AS A GIFT FROM GOD!
Saturday, March 10, 2012
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Can we separate Biblical truth from the truth of life?
Can We Separate Biblical Truth from the Truth of Life?
I began to reflect when I heard a question: “There is only one Bible—why there are so many Churches?” What’s the difference? Men and women,—Christian or claiming to be—use the name of God or used by God as they claimed it, making it appear sacred what they had selfishly or doing real selfless actions for the sake of goodness. These contribute to why we have so many Churches believing in one Bible. The question can be offensive and stupid to those who believe that truth of life is not limited to the Bible. Only the man with eyes covered by the literal Bible can see the question above as right.
History must be counted to understand the truth of man. If a man did some foul thing, someone will respond with equal opposite reactions. The Civil War was true, George Washington was true; Philippine Encomendero and friar abuse were true, Filipino patriotic reactions were true as well. Yes, the Bible didn’t say so, but it doesn’t mean it was not true. Some Church leaders are guilty of teaching that the only source of truth is the Bible (which is not the intention of it, but can be used to rebuke the other side of truth). No, human truth is also recorded in the history book. Their experience, exercise, hardship, and cries for life are their truth. Imperialism is true—and so is the nationalism.
Truth in humanity is not limited with our religious and spiritual truth, but truth is truth of total man (with heart, mind, spirit and strength). Yes, one Christian group is separated from another because of political, social, and moral issues seen after the inability to submit to the wisdom of Christ. As a matter of fact, is separated from Christ except from the name “Christian.” No human can pretend that history is nothing—except the bad guys in history. No human is immune to the created darkness—unless you learn to act like a beast. Jesus as the light must be lifted up for this darkness.
Human experience and history determines which Church is detaching the Light (of life, Jesus) from the sustained darkness by greedy spirits. God’s designed nature is displayed by those who seek for justice, love, and righteousness. The Bible is not Words directing the minds to heaven and spirits away from the facts of darkness making the ruler of the world successful. The Bible should bring God to earth not that it brings mind/focus to heaven. If we know the truth of actions and human reactions, the struggle of nations and race against evils, then the question above is nothing. The idea that truth is found only in the Bible is myth. Human experience is the measure of Biblical importance. Evil action ruins, but love sustains life. The truth is in history too. The Bible’s claim should be affirmed by it. Indeed, you cannot separate Bible truth from the truth of life. Only the offenders of God’s purpose will want to separate them, if not deny them or use them for selfish assertion.
Many ‘guilty’ pastors makes people think that Christianity’s Gospel is irrelevant—or that Jesus has nothing to do with our life here and now (denying His claim as the light of the world). But what is put in action that violates people’s right to exist is dictated by his belief, philosophy, or reasons in the heart, mind, spirit, and strength in which Jesus said to be filled with our love for God. He said, “Love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, spirit and strength.” This is not something that commanded us to separate ourselves from the talk of life in this world, but it should affect the world. The Bible is the book of truth about the wisdom of God for life, while history book is for facts of events that make us see that darkness is built if Word for life is not. [Nation's Historical Sense and Ecclesiality for Life, p.140]
Tuesday, March 6, 2012
Can We Separate Biblical Truth from the Truth of Life?ro
Can We Separate Biblical Truth from the Truth of Life?
I began to reflect when I heard a question: “There is only one Bible—why there are so many Churches?” What’s the difference? Men and women,—Christian or claiming to be—use the name of God or used by God as they claimed it, making it appear sacred what they had selfishly or doing real selfless actions for the sake of goodness. These contribute to why we have so many Churches believing in one Bible. The question can be offensive and stupid to those who believe that truth of life is not limited to the Bible. Only the man with eyes covered by the literal Bible can see the question above as right.
History must be counted to understand the truth of man. If a man did some foul thing, someone will respond with equal opposite reactions. The Civil War was true, George Washington was true; Philippine Encomendero and friar abuse were true, Filipino patriotic reactions were true as well. Yes, the Bible didn’t say so, but it doesn’t mean it was not true. Some Church leaders are guilty of teaching that the only source of truth is the Bible (which is not the intention of it, but can be used to rebuke the other side of truth). No, human truth is also recorded in the history book. Their experience, exercise, hardship, and cries for life are their truth. Imperialism is true—and so is the nationalism.
Truth in humanity is not limited with our religious and spiritual truth, but truth is truth of total man (with heart, mind, spirit and strength). Yes, one Christian group is separated from another because of political, social, and moral issues seen after the inability to submit to the wisdom of Christ. As a matter of fact, is separated from Christ except from the name “Christian.” No human can pretend that history is nothing—except the bad guys in history. No human is immune to the created darkness—unless you learn to act like a beast. Jesus as the light must be lifted up for this darkness.
Human experience and history determines which Church is detaching the Light (of life, Jesus) from the sustained darkness by greedy spirits. God’s designed nature is displayed by those who seek for justice, love, and righteousness. The Bible is not Words directing the minds to heaven and spirits away from the facts of darkness making the ruler of the world successful. The Bible should bring God to earth not that it brings mind/focus to heaven. If we know the truth of actions and human reactions, the struggle of nations and race against evils, then the question above is nothing. The idea that truth is found only in the Bible is myth. Human experience is the measure of Biblical importance. Evil action ruins, but love sustains life. The truth is in history too. The Bible’s claim should be affirmed by it. Indeed, you cannot separate Bible truth from the truth of life. Only the offenders of God’s purpose will want to separate them, if not deny them or use them for selfish assertion.
Many ‘guilty’ pastors makes people think that Christianity’s Gospel is irrelevant—or that Jesus has nothing to do with our life here and now (denying His claim as the light of the world). But what is put in action that violates people’s right to exist is dictated by his belief, philosophy, or reasons in the heart, mind, spirit, and strength in which Jesus said to be filled with our love for God. He said, “Love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, spirit and strength.” This is not something that commanded us to separate ourselves from the talk of life in this world, but it should affect the world. The Bible is the book of truth about the wisdom of God for life, while history book is for facts of events that make us see that darkness is built if Word for life is not. [Nation's Historical Sense and Ecclesiality of Life, p.140]
Friday, February 24, 2012
Junes' Sense: Nation's Historical Sense & Ecclesiality for Life
Nation's Historical Sense & Ecclesiality for Life
Nation’s Historical Sense and Ecclesiality for Life (Nationalistic Church Witness of Catholicity)
- What inspired you to write this book? In my honest thought is that human condition of the “weak” is also shaped by the late 19th century capitalist’s imperialism and its global economic agenda, seems causing the treats to human as consumerist-subject, and the Church appeared naively in the business of nicety. Truth in actuality and of people’s history of resistance defines what human can do in response to his reality. The Philippine Independent Church (nationalistic catholic) is one product of human cry for justice, found itself embracing the Christian Faith, in a very strategic time parallel to the condition of life that caused the first Christian community in which the message of God’s love for all people make sense. Now, I wanted to see that Christianity makes sense only if not detach from the condition of life that shaped it. The PIC church (and those came out of struggle for freedom) embraced God’s message of inclusive love, peace and justice are messages not to lead people ‘out of this world’. Seeing the American fundamentalist/Pentecostal type, and the Roman Catholic Church positioned help of the imperialist’s agenda while promoting teachings about personal experience and self, end-time gospel and heaven, etc., indirectly serving the imperialist world. Nationalistic (product of history) church (including Anglicans) is now very strategic religion in carrying the core message about love for all people. It has lens for the importance, significance and spirit of Christianity for life, consistent with the condition of life in Moses time and the first Christians in the Roman imperial rule defined by Pax Romana. Where and when seems Pax Americana is established the nationalistic church born witnessing the inclusive love of God.
- Summarize your book in one to three sentences. Filipino History of freedom, fairness, racial respect and independence from the cruelty by “superiority complex” of the ruler, when the Filipino revolutionaries are willing to die to change the evil situation of their time, is one ultimate display of a human design in them. Giving importance to the thought said ‘we are all created equal’ is one demonstration that Filipinos saw the same values as others, and fighting is not for dominance against another but to make real of “equality” with others. Reaching the cause of struggle in forming the nationalistic catholic witnessing God’s love for all races (in Philippine Independent Church) is one perfect end of the struggle, proclaimed by Filipino people, then, led by Filipino priests from Roman Catholic. Church is (beyond institution and dogmatism) to promote, protect and preserve life under God. Freedom became their language to express God’s Kingdom.
- What is the overall theme of your book? Struggle for freedom, respect for human and racial dignity ended in God’s truth of life. Ecclesiality (churchness) FOR LIFE witnessing for God’s love for all is a MUST emphases as the churches today seems reduced into being church for doctrine, claim, self-help, formula for richness, diverting attention to heaven (away from this world), captivating mind with fear of the end of the world, only to be hijacked by the ruler of the world. Indirectly (and consciously or not) became church of imperialist.
- Where does this book take place? In the ‘home of freedom’ where Thomas Jefferson taught “We are all created equal’, the United States of America.
- Who are the main characters and why are they important to the story? Late 19th century and early 20th century Filipino people defending their freedom that ended up embracing the Church of Christ as the end of their struggle for fairness and equality and respect. The main character is the Filipino people and clergy who responded to the call of their time, embracing the Witness of the Church of Christ about LOVE FOR ALL PEOPLE to “brotherhood” state under God’s fatherhood. Saw the core value of Christianity (FOR LIFE) is NOT OBSOLETE in our time, but for eternal life embracing the whole.
- Why do you think that this book will appeal to readers? All people in this world know the value of our human reactions (and the record of it in history) to the evil, injustice, inhumane, unfairness, inequality, disrespect, deception and lies. All people of nations has this commonality to chant against ending the evil regime, the cause of darkness that victimizes all humans. Indeed we are humans recognizing what bind us affirming our normalcy in this world. Indeed we are “WE” for the common good. All have history to treasure, our raw material to understand human (against “us and them” mentality). We the citizens of this world educated by our past experiences affirming to live as one human citizen of this world. If there is god (as we all believe), he must be the God and the Source of LIFE.
- How is your book relevant in today’s society? HISTORICAL SENSE AND ECCLESIALITY FOR LIFE is about life affirmed in history that built sensitivity and consciousness or sense to serve, preserve and promote life. Seeing God as the Source of life (revealed in the struggle of the past) is one most important aspect. Religion is power, “god” is power, and religion is REAL: if not for life then for what? It is not giving justice to God and Christianity when we take the issue of life out of God. Seems darkness enveloped us, of course the LIGHT of the world (Christ) must be seen as is. What is the wisdom of history must ones anchor to lead us to next level for goodness. We cannot waste the lesson of history, instead, our instrument to celebrate our humanness.
- What makes your book different from other books like it? Super great I think because is authored by the most humble kind of person, also honest human that cannot ignored the thoughts for life. The book is addresses one of the most important event: Imperialism FOR MARKET and RACISM undermining the ‘human equality’ seen by the founder of America, and the core reason of Filipino revolutionist; When that kind of imperialism positioned as the “World Power” proclaimed in the Philippines in 1902, the real vehicle for life, the church nationalistic catholic, and the God of life is affirmed and proclaimed in the ecclesiality of nationalistic PIC.
- What do you want readers to take away from your writing? The thought that God, Church or Christianity is not actually offensive, bad, ugly, not enemy, not vehicle and deception of Satan. Honest humanness in the struggle for good is one ultimate revealing “teacher” if not stained by propaganda and lies. In that honesty points to the goodness of God. The truth that sets free is not at all lies, and so we can glorify God from that.
- How did you learn about topic? (i.e. personal experience, education, etc.) I grew up learning the message in the church which made me Christian into mature age. In my reflective moment the thoughts of life came to me naturally, and said yes to something that I learned from my theological study, and disturbed often times by the thoughts that to me offensive to the very purpose of God, like detaching God from the things that humans are willing to die for (respect for human life). I am not currently involve in the Philippine independent Church but I see the Church from the distance, as one very strategic church for the very purpose of God for life, founded where and when the very threat (imperialist of racist-inequality and global power for market/wealth-Mammon) to life is established.
- Is there a particular passage you’d like us to utilize? If so, please provide. “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” (Matthew 22:37-40). “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’ The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these.” (Mark 12:30).